Saturday, December 3, 2011

Advocacy Project: Fact Sheet



Many Pollutants threaten the Great Lakes. 

Facts about raw sewage threatening our water.


What we need to know…
The Great Lakes provide 30 million Americans with drinking water and support a huge multi-billion dollar recreation and tourism industry. (EPA – United States Environmental Protection Agency)

Many pollutants that get in to the Great Lakes remain there because it is a relatively closed system. (EPA Quality of Our Nation’s Water report)

Where does this pollution come from?
Pollution in the Great Lakes comes form multiple sources. A few of which are landfills, urban runoff, and combined sewer overflow. (EPA Quality of Our Nation’s Water report)

A study for the Healing Our Waters Great Lakes Coalition reports in 2009 five U.S. cities on the Great Lakes - “Detroit, Cleveland, Buffalo, Milwaukee and Gary, Ind.-discharged 41 billion gallons of untreated sewage and filthy storm water into the lakes”.

A 2006 study revealed that 20 cities containing one third of the regions population produced three trillion liters of waste a year equaling 1.2 million Olympic swimming pools of waste a year or 100 pools a day.

Every year beaches are closed due to combined sewer overflow contaminating lakes. (Great Lakes Commission)

Why does this happen?
Heavy rains often overwhelm combined sewer pipes, forcing cities to discharge untreated sewage and storm water into the nearest lake or river. (Healing Our Waters Great Lakes Coalition report and safewater.org)

What is happening around this issue?
The EPA is suggesting “blending”, allowing untreated sewage blended with rain water to be dumped in the lakes. Currently the clean water act strictly prohibits this due to the health risks raw sewage imposes. (FreshWaterFuture.org and the EPA)

What is being done to help preserve our water and resources?
There are bills H.R.425 and S.147 proposed to more easily assess fines currently in place for breaking the law, and to instill new fines giving 20 years to upgrade sewage treatment infrastructure. (Illinois Review)

What can we do to help?
All or any of these…
Ask your House Representative to vote yes on bill H.R.425 or your Senator to vote yes on S.147, the Great Lakes Water Protection Act.

Contact your local environmental agency and let them know this is important to you.

Nationally, contact the EPA directly. Ben Grumbles, Assistant Administrator for Water is the point person for blending. 202-564-5700 or email grumbles.benjamin@epa.gov.



SOURCES












Sunday, November 27, 2011

Eye Opener: Photo Essay

A Look at How My Household and What I do to  Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Re-purpose.

I wanted to look at the efforts we take in my house that help the environment in some way. It was kind of fun and exciting because as I started to look around and as I was taking pictures I started seeing even more things that we were doing to attempt to create or add to the balance for all the things we do to use resources.

Below are pictures to share with you what I found.



First of all. I have a little bucket by my sink that I stick food scraps in when I'm cooking and cleaning to get them to the compost bucket.  

BONUSES!! The bucket I use is a left over plastic bucket I purchased with hemp hearts that I ate, putting it to a handy use.  You see that I'm pouring loose leaf tea leaves that I used in a reusable strainer so I'm not using individual tea bags that not only take up more room in shipping, cost more to purchase, as well as use bleach to bleach the bags so they look fresh and not their natural off white color. (I do still use tea bags tea for some teas and if I'm traveling, but at home I try to use loose leaf.)




Here I'm taking the contents of the small bucket by my sink and throwing it in my larger bucket that I'm currently using for compost holdings. 

BONUS!  The bucket is an old cat litter bucket. 




Here is the worm bin where the compost from the cat bucket will end up.  Joel (my husband) has been using our compost in this bin for a few years, experimenting with vermicomposting to get the most result from the least input work - with the condition that it never causes any bug issues, smell, or let the worms escape.  So far, so good.  The brown spots on the top of the bin are from vent holes for air, which some very few, very small things also get out, but they also almost instantly die out in the drier air outside the bucket, so they have not been a threat to the no bugs free in the house condition.  The brown stuff can be easily wiped off by a rag with regular house cleaning.... right honey! :-) Hint, hint.




If you look carefully you can see some little reddish worms in the dirt on the white paper. They normally live below the surface away from the light but some of the lower dirt was brought to the top so you can see the little worker worms.




On top of the worms we threw the compostable plates from class last Monday.  You can break them up but Joel is doing some experimentation to see how throwing them in whole will work.




You can also use an ACTUAL composting bucket, like this one that Joel uses at his house. The  charcoal filter on the top REALLY WORKS!




On top of the plates we added the mucky half composted stuff from the green caddy above.  Joel was out of town and the food in the green container had been in there too long; weeks in fact.  It hadn't been opened, and was well composting into a liquid and smelled quite unpleasant.  Worse than I have ever smelled before. Drastic measures had to be taken...




We broke out the incense and a fan briefly and then the smell was gone. Lesson.... add the sealed composting to the worms BEFORE you go away... or take it outside!




Joel adds a bag that he puts some water on to keep moisture in the bin, the light out for the worms and this seems to be a huge help to having the smell not come out of the bin.  The worm bin does not have an odor even when you stand right by it.  Not even after all the unpleasant smells that we added.  The worms will also eventually use the bag for food and break it down as well.



HERE, finally, is the goal and benefit of this process. When you separate out the worms from their castings, you have worm poop. Also known as extremely good nutritious dirt; the Cadillac of the dirt world.

What do you do with all this dirt you might be asking?




Here is one option.  In this growing container Joel just started basil.  Along with the dirt/worm castings that our little worm workers made, in this pot there is organic potting soil, a soil additive called perlite and Peat Moss that the basil will grow in.
  



These are starter cubes that have been watered with nutrients and have other properties that make them ideal for the purpose of starting new seeds. The ones you see are baby Kohlrabi and in the back in the 4th row you can just see is lettuce. 

Joel usually uses these cubes for putting in his hydroponics garden that basically uses water, nutrients and rock that these are planted in.  Some of these, however, will be added into the white soil container above. He is experimenting with new plants and different ways to grow them. 

There you have the circle of where the food goes and helps us make new food in my house.



Just for fun... these are Kohlrabi seeds.  They are super cool because they are silver and shiny. My Dad grew Kohlrabi when I was a kid but I don't think I ever saw the seeds.


Let's go back to some other things we are doing. 



This is the filter I use for my pod coffee maker. I like it because the amount of coffee grounds I use is considerably less even compared a small coffee pot.  I can buy little cups all ready to go, but this allows me to drink the coffee, or coffee combinations I want.  I also don't have to commit to a whole pot if I just want a small cup.  

BONUS!  If you look to the top left you will see the coffee I purchased at the farmers market by a local roaster. YUMMY! To the right of that is an old spaghetti jar that I use as my water glass.  And, hey... another bonus! The fancy feast box beyond that is now used for a tea holder on my counter for easy access. 




Speaking of jars.... I look in my cupboard and see all sorts of jars re-purposed for bulk items I get at the store. Everything from peanut butter, Jelly and frappuccino bottles.

 


I re use my plastic bags that I get from some of the stores, if I forget to bring a reusable bag, for cleaning cat litter. (You would think my 17 year-old, Nikita, would be cleaning up after herself by now... but NO! Darn the lack of opposable thumbs.)

BONUS! The UMD store bag hanging on the door knob is the long time litter scoop holder.




Of course we do the typical recycling... using litter buckets, again, as the in the house recycling buckets. They are much easier to carry up the big scary hill in winter, to the recycling can.

We make good use of our old litter buckets. They used to not be recyclable and it felt horrible not to try to re-use them.

I realize the obvious is, of course, get litter in bags, right?  This is a good idea, however, for some reason the good litter sales seem to be on the containers rather than the bags for some reason.  So, we weigh that piece out when purchasing too.


And last but not least... for my FAVORITE re-purposing of all!!!  :)







MY KITTIES!!!!
Nikita on the left and Alex on the right! They were both shelter cats. Nikita was given to the shelter when she was around 6 months due to too many pets. Alex was a wee baby when I picked him out. 

They even come with a BONUS!!  Nikita is re-purposing a cat food box for her special chair.  And Alex is laying on his favorite toys... paper that came from packing in a shipped box, from the backing of plastic used to winterize a drafty window and a Whole Foods paper bag that broke. 

Happy recycling in what ever form that is.



Sunday, November 20, 2011

Advocacy Project: Issue Overview

Lake Superior - Duluth, MN


What is the issue? 
The Great Lakes are becoming extremely polluted. They provide drinking water for 30 million people, swimming, recreation, food. Businesses depend on the lakes having water that can be made potable for citizens in the United States and Canada.


What current Legislation is proposed to address this issue?
H.R.425  TITLE: Great Lakes Water Protection Act.
"prohibit publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) from intentionally diverting waste streams to bypass any portion of the treatment facility if the diversion results in a discharge into the Great Lakes"

go to http://thomas.loc.gov/home/thomas.php
Search for "water" and then control/find "H.R.425"


Who is affected the most? What is to be lost? Gained?
Passing the bill means water sewage plants would accrue fines after the 20 years given to upgrade their facilities if they did not meet the legal levels. Fines currently in place are capped at $37,500/day and would increase up to $100,000.  This bill would make it easier to assess fines for those not meeting current set levels.

Not passing the bill; the fish, animal and plant life and the whole eco system will continue to be drastically affected.  There are already signs in places along the lakes warning of water pollution and to avoid all contact.   We who drink that water may feel it is us that are most effected, especially as water become more expensive and harder to filter.

What is gained by not passing this bill?  Status quo. Waste continues to be dumped. There will be less planning for upgrading systems and spending money to do so at treatment facilities.

What is gained by passing the bill? Our water supply has a longer life. Money is saved for filtering the drinking water. Animals and the ecosystem continue, and perhaps do some healing.  Money is  gained in fines going  to “generate financial resources for the Great Lakes states to improve wastewater treatment options, habitat protection and wastewater treatment systems.”


Consequences for individuals most effected, families and society?
Cost of drinking water filtration would increase for water treatment plants and citizens affecting us on an individual, family and societal level. Currently many illnesses arise each year from sewage in our drinking water; this would get worse.   Lake Superior, being the largest Great, takes longer for contaminants to be noticed.  There will be continued costs to society to cleaning the lake waters. jobs and businesses will be lost as people making their living  working on the lake as fisherpersons, and eventually, recreation as those activities are not safe. Families may have struggles and this effects economy and society.


What is the economic Impact? To whom?
If the bill passes, treatment facilities will spend money upgrading to meet standards. There will be fines for those facilities not meeting standards in time.  Economic costs if the bill does not pass are going to be costs keeping water clean enough to drink. We currently pay for that process and will, mostlikely continue. There is lost revenue from those whos livelihood depend on the lake in fishing or recreation.  Chicago says that swim bans alone cost them 2.4 million each year in revenue. If illnesses arise from untreated water, that is another potential economic burden.


What are economic benefits? To whom?
Benefits, as it stands now, are gained by publicly owned treatment works that handle sewage not having to make changes in how they handle and route waste saving them money.


What are the social costs? Who bears them?
We all bear the cost if this does not pass. We may bear it no matter what, but the speed of the water toxicity will be much faster as a whole and certainly in particular areas.  We need water to live. This not only affects our actual life, but water scarcity creates higher prices, fear and physical discomfort or illness. These things do not bring out the best in mankind. Who knows what chaos could occur out of desperation. Perhaps that is a long way down the road, or seems extreme, but if water can only be had by those who can afford it, that could set up very dangerous scenarios. If you add issues with diseases that can come with untreated sewage, that leads to a whole new set of challenges socially as well.

Where do we go for water if the lakes are not filterable?  Looking at the information on this website that shows potential water shortages for various reasons, in the U.S.
http://www.global-warming-forecasts.com/water-supply-shortage-water-scarcity-climate.php
We see that going somewhere else to provide water isn't a very feasible option.


What are the social benefits? Who benefits?
Social benefits if the bill is passed will probably go unnoticed. We will have water and all the other benefits the Great Lakes bring us and, for society, this will be uneventful. We will still have concerns over the water because even with the change, we have work to do to clean and keep the lakes clean.  The thirty Million people who utilize the Great Lakes for drinking water will benefit greatly.


What are the barriers? How can they be overcome?
The barriers are the sewage treatment plants not wanting to spend money to upgrade, perhaps not having the money to upgrade. My guess is that other industries around the Great Lakes not wanting to do their part effects the treatment facilities in justifying their stance on not spending funds to upgrade. For instance, The Coast Guard resists forcing shore disposal for the shipping industry causing two million pounds of cargo residue to be tossed in the lake each year saving $35 million each year for the shipping industry.  Legislation has been relaxed for shipping, the treatment plants may want to get the same benefits. Citizens groups don’t have the money and man power to do as much education is needed. 

I’m not sure how these hurdles can be overcome.  Senator Durbin who is involved in the bill says “the bi-partisan legislative efforts reflected the public’s desire to keep the Great Lakes clean”. Hopefully that means that if people keep making their voice heard action will be more easily taken. 


What resources are needed to address this Issue?
Money is always a helpful to use it to educate about the issue or as a tool to get people and government to do what we want. People need to keep speaking, sharing the facts, and working for this. Perhaps we can have some sway the treatment plants by pointing out it is 20 years and technology will have changed by then making some of these things easier. We can support and promote treatment plants and companies that are on board and following the guide lines even if the only real result is creating awareness about the issue. 


What is the history on this issue?
The Clean Water Act has been in effect for 30 years and the amount of untreated sewage released into rivers and lakes is astounding. 1.3 trillion gallons according to Great Lakes Aquatic Habitat News. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed relaxations allowing more untreated waste to be dumped. This bill is looking to tighten some restrictions back up. 


Who would support and oppose this issue?
Supporting this issue would be people living on the lake or in the area who use the lake for water, food and recreation.  Waste treatment plants on the path to improve. People that believe the lakes are  a precious resource and that scarcity of clean water is a potential.  Native American people who believe in taking care of mother earth now and for future generations. The rest of the U.S. as time goes and less clean or just less water is available to other parts of the country. 

Opposing this issue would be publicly owned treatment works that don’t have the funds to make the changes.  


How can you involve allies and opponents in advocacy efforts?
These are publicly funded plants. We need to continue helping them and politicians understand the big picture of consequences to our drinking water, economy, health, revenue lost, etc.   We can point out the 20 year window to make changes. Making the commitment to changes now may take away mandatory changes with less warning if things get worse rapidly. Those voting live in areas around the Great Lakes and these issues effect us all. According to the Buffalo News, these improvements will stimulate the economy which tends to be something they are interested in hearing about.  


What do I recommend?
The eco system of the lakes are very complex; it's easy for us take them for granted by not understanding the intricacies of the balance and chain of events that happen when that balance is stressed.  This issue isn’t in our drinking glass at the moment: we need to think to the future. Vote yes for this policy. 


References








Thursday, November 17, 2011

Share & Voice - Video: Monsanto and FOX News


This is a video about a court case we studied in my philosophy class. I didn't realize it was the same story right away. it is about the two reporters who were hired at FOX to be investigative reporters. They did their job uncovering the fact that bovine growth hormone was in much of the milk in the United Sates, and the effects that weren't being stated. FOX was threatened by Monsanto and suggested that FOX not run the story but that the reporters keep quite for which they didn't agree.  There were no disputes on the claim the reporter made, just the concern of running the story.


The interesting thing that also comes with this, and is very concerning when it comes to getting the truth on environmental as well as every other issue, is the court case that ruled...


The court did not dispute the heart of Akre’s claim, that Fox pressured her to broadcast a false story to protect the broadcaster from having to defend the truth in court, as well as suffer the ire of irate advertisers. Fox argued from the first, and failed on three separate occasions, in front of three different judges, to have the case tossed out on the grounds there is no hard, fast, and written rule against deliberate distortion of the news.

The attorneys for Fox, owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, argued the First Amendment gives broadcasters the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on the public airwaves.
In its six-page written decision, the Court of Appeals held that the Federal Communications Commission position against news distortion is only a “policy,” not a promulgated law, rule, or regulation. Fox aired a report after the ruling saying it was “totally vindicated” by the verdict.


Another link to another story about this same case
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/11-the-media-can-legally-lie/

Where I actually found the video was in this story, Why are Genetically Modified Foods not Labeled?

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Advocacy Project: Healthy People/THOMAS

Choose 1 HealthyPeople 2020 environmental objective (or sub-objective) in which you are interested. Give its definition, its target, and its baseline.

2020 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OBJECTIVE: 
Surface and ground water quality
OBJECTIVE:   EH-4  Increase the proportion of persons served by community water systems who receive a supply of drinking water that meets the regulations of the Safe Drinking Water Act
BASELINE:  89 percent of persons served by community water systems received a supply of drinking water that meets the regulations of the Safe Drinking Water Act in 2005
TARGET:   91 percent


Find a related bill in THOMAS or the state legislation/bill search. Report the following information as shown in the example. (Be sure to link to where you found this information). As shown in the last two lines, include what action you recommend and the appropriate political representative you would contact to share your opinion.

BILL:
 H.R.425 
LATEST TITLE: Great Lakes Water Protection Act
OFFICIAL TITLE AS INTRODUCED: To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish a deadline for restricting sewage dumping into the Great Lakes and to fund programs and activities for improving wastewater discharges into the Great Lakes.
SPONSOR: Rep Dold, Robert J. [IL-10] (introduced 1/25/2011)  
Cosponsors (1)
LATEST MAJOR ACTION: 1/26/2011 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
RECOMMENDATION: Vote YES for H.R.425 Great Lakes Water Protection Act
MY POLITICAL REPRESENTATIVE: Congressman Chip Cravaack 







Thursday, November 10, 2011

Share & Voice: Robert Kenner, Director of Food, Inc. visits UMD

Robert Kenner, the director of the 2008 documentary Food, Inc. spoke at UMD October 20th.  I may be a little biased but this was a great event!  Robert talked about various aspects of our food touching on topics like GMOs, cloned meat, how our food has become controlled and become more corporate, updates on some of the people in Food, Inc, what we might do to help, and more.

One of the stories he told that I found fantastic was of the woman in the movie who was "mass producing" chickens for a large company. There were chickens crammed into a house, their legs couldn't carry them because of the hormone induced rapid body growth and dead chickens lying around that the farmer had to go in and pull out. She was very open in the film because she was struggling with the way the corporation was forcing farmers to produce.  The women lost her contract because of the fact that she was in Food, Inc. sharing her story.  She is now raising free range, well taken care of chickens. Robert said that when he interviewed her the first time the chickens were walking around in a days, scared of people and he said it was really icky.  This time when he interviewed her 3 days before his talk at UMD, he said that the chickens were lively and interested in what was going on. He had one in his lap, one on each food and others running around him. The farmer is also much happier as well.

I was one of the major planners of this event.  We had many hopes and goals with this, but one of mine was to bring many people together around this issue. I was hoping to introduces people who were not so familiar to the information. I also wanted to help bring awareness to groups in the community that are doing things that align with the message around Food, Inc. We had groups tabling outside the gym and put together a program booklet of resources in the area where people can eat, shop, grow their own food, volunteer or support in other ways.   (I have many extra if anyone would like one!)
Robert Kenner and I at the UMD farm

We had a really great turn out. I sincerely hope that we have inspired a few people to make some changes, taught them something new about what is going on with our food or found a way to support the effort to better, safer, less incorporated food.




Sunday, November 6, 2011

Advocacy Project: My Political Representatives

Find below my political representatives, their affiliation, contact information and website.

PRESIDENT
Barack H. Obama .
Democrat
Contact -
Via the web - http://capwiz.com/politicsol/mail/?id=3181&lvl=F&chamber=P
or - http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Via the mail - 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 (202) 456-1414

Website - http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/president-obama


CONGRESSPERSONS
Amy Klobuchar - U.S. Senate
Democrat
Contact -
302 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20500

202-224-3244
Website - http://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/

Al Franken - U.S. Senate
Democrat
Contact Information - 
Via the web - http://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=email_al
309 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20500

202-224-5641
http://www.franken.senate.gov/

Chip Cravaack - U.S. House
Republican
Contact Information -
Via the web - http://cravaack.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=58&sectiontree=3,58
508 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20500
OR
Gerald W. Heaney Federal Building and United States Courthouse
515 West First Street, Room 235
Duluth, MN 55802
Phone: (218) 740-7803
http://cravaack.house.gov/


STATE LEGISLATORS
Kerry Gauthier - MN House
Democrat
225 State Office Building
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155
651-296-4246 or 800-704-4945
rep.kerry.gauthier@house.mn
http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/members/members.asp?id=15348

Roger Reinert - MN Senate
Democrat
Contact
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
State Office Building,
Room 149
St. Paul, MN 55155-1206
651.296.4188
sen.roger.reinert@senate.mn
http://www.senate.leg.state.mn.us/members/member_bio.php?district=07


GOVERNOR
Mark Dayton
Democrat
Contact -
Via the web - http://mn.gov/governor/contact-us/form/
Office of the Governor
130 State Capitol
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Telephone: 651-201-3400
Toll Free: 800-657-3717
Minnesota Relay 800-627-3529
http://mn.gov/governor/


COUNTY BOARD PRESIDENT
St. Louis County doesn't seem to have a president. Instead 7 County Commissioners
Contact information for the clerk -
Contact
Patricia Stolee, Deputy County Auditor - Clerk of the County Board
Phone:218-726-2385
StoleeP@stlouiscountymn.gov
http://stlouiscountymn.gov/GOVERNMENT/BoardofCommissioners.aspx
http://www.stlouiscountymn.gov/


MAYOR
Don Ness
Democrat
Mayor's Office
dness@duluthmn.gov
Room 402, 411 West First Street
Duluth, MN 55802
Phone: (218) 730-5230

Contact Via Pacebook - http://www.facebook.com/ness.duluth
http://www.duluthmn.gov/mayor/